X

Notifications

What's next for InCommons

InCommons.org will soon be closing down. For an update on what’s next for the work of InCommons, please check out Bush Foundation President Jennifer Ford Reedy’s latest blog post. Thank you for being a part of the InCommons community!

University of Minnesota

UMN Researchers Taking on the Wicked Problems in Minnesota

Click on the link on the right to read an article in the Winter 2012 edition of the UMN School of Public Health's Journal Advances to learn about UMN researchers doing bold work to around water pollution, the obesity epidemic, tobacco use, and HIV transmission in Minnesota and nationally.

View Details

Health Care Reform Fundamentals

Daniel K. Zismer, Associate Professor and Director of Executive MHA Programs at the UMN School of Public Health argues that the specifics of health care reform are relatively not as important as the fundamentals. In this guide Zismer focuses on the likely fundamentals of reform and how reform fundamentals of health care affect (and challenge) our “system” of health care delivery in the U.S.

View Details

Spiritual Activism

Spiritual activism grew out of a push in the mid-90’s to link individual transformation with societal transformation. It is based on the foundations of Eastern philosophy and thinkers such as the Dalai Lama and Mahatma Gandhi, who famously advised, “Be the change you want to see in the world.”

Researched and produced by: UMN Center for Intergrative Leadership, Spring 2012.
See following link to view all eleven community organizing models: http://www.incommons.org/node/6591

View Details

Social Entrepreneurship

Since the tech boom and rise of neo-conservatism in the early 1980’s, a fundamental structural change occurred in society. Instead of looking to business or government to solve societal issues, citizens began to “innovate for social good” using the same entrepreneurial acumen driving new business ventures. Ashoka: Innovators for the Public, founded by Bill Drayton in 1980, was an early fosterer of this movement, funding and connecting social entrepreneurs from around the world. Ashoka has now grown to an association of over 2,000 Fellows in over 60 countries on the world's five main continents. Meg Wheatley and Deborah Frieze have recently merged this concept of social entrepreneurship with systems thinking in their “Walk Out, Walk On” model, dubbing social entrepreneurs as “Walk Outs” that refuse to work from negative dominant values or paradigms, “walking on” to become social change pioneers. Similar to Ashoka, Walk Out, Walk On seeks to organize individual entrepreneurs for collective impact.

View Details

Pedagogy of the Oppressed

Paulo Freire’s model embeds community organizing in an education model, claiming that the purpose of education is to build an ethic of democracy through literacy and the development of critical consciousness. Freire has drawn upon, and woven together, a number of strands of thinking about educational practice and liberation. His social analysis is rooted in the branch of Marxist theory of ‘diabolical materialism’, and therefore sees the class struggle as relationships between two primary groups, ‘the oppressors’ and ‘the oppressed’. Friere’s analysis goes deeper to explore more complex relationships between these groups and how both of their class identities or self-images are derived from how the other class views them. Educationists and community organizers all over the world have drawn heavily from Paulo Freire’s “pedagogy of the oppressed.”

Researched and produced by: UMN Center for Intergrative Leadership, Spring 2012.
See following link to view all eleven community organizing models: http://www.incommons.org/node/6591

View Details

Faith-Based Organizing Model

FBCO has its roots in the organizing of Saul Alinsky. In his organizing work in Chicago’s working class neighborhoods in the 1930s and 1940s, Alinsky drew on the Jewish community for both human and financial capital. However, following Alinsky’s 1972 death, Ernesto Cortés, Jr., a young organizer from San Antonio, began to explore the benefits of going beyond Alinsky’s use of religious institutions as sources of people to a model of organizing that integrated faith traditions into the organizing itself. Through his efforts organizing among the lay leadership, mostly female, of Hispanic Catholic parishes in San Antonio, Cortés developed a unique model of organizing. This model– traditionally local in nature – has grown in prominence on the national level since 2008, building political power through new alliances and national organizing tactics.

Researched and produced by: UMN Center for Intergrative Leadership, Spring 2012.
See following link to view all eleven community organizing models: http://www.incommons.org/node/6591

View Details

Emergent Change

At the end of the ‘90’s there was a growing awareness of the need to bring individuals together in more meaningful, participatory conversation and action. A sense developed among some social change pioneers that previous organizing models focused primarily on either will, heart, or mind, resulting in action not systemic or sustained enough to solve the most complex social, economic, and environmental issues in our society. To integrate these three modes of action, various global networks developed over the past fifteen years around a model emphasizing emergent change. The foremost networks include Theory U (Presencing Institute), Walk Out Walk On (The Berkana Institute), and Art of Hosting.

Researched and produced by: UMN Center for Intergrative Leadership, Spring 2012.
See following link to view all eleven community organizing models: http://www.incommons.org/node/6591

View Details

Conciousness Raising

Consciousness-raising (CR) as an organizing model originated in 1967 with the New York Radical Women’s organization (NYRW) and became the predominate organizing model of the women’s liberation movement of the 1960’s and 1970’s. Though it represented a unique theory for bringing about radical change, CR drew on the experiences of the earlier labor and civil rights movements. In fact, the term “consciousness-raising” came from NYRW member Anne Forer recalling that labor movements had spoken of raising the consciousness of workers who did not know they were oppressed. She asked the other women to give her examples from their lives of how they had been oppressed, because she needed to “raise her consciousness.” This model of a dozen or less women gathering to each discuss problems of collective oppression quickly spread from New York to Chicago and then across the United States. At the movement’s peak in 1973, it is estimated that 100,000 women across the U.S. belonged to CR groups. As CR gained momentum in the feminist movement, gay rights activists also adopted the model.

Researched and produced by: UMN Center for Intergrative Leadership, Spring 2012.

View Details

Civil Disobedience Organizing Model

Civil disobedience was defined by political philosopher John Rawls (1971) as a “public, non-violent and conscientious breach of law undertaken with the aim of bringing about a change in laws or government policies." Individuals are motivated to engage in civil disobedience by a range of values such as justice, transparency, security, stability, privacy, integrity and autonomy.

Researched and produced by: UMN Center for Intergrative Leadership, Spring 2012.
See following link to view all eleven community organizing models: http://www.incommons.org/node/6591

View Details

Asset Based Community Development Model

Asset based community development grew out of the earlier organizing models pioneered by Saul Alinsky and Jane Adams as well as the community development movement. It's priority is to bring light to as well as utilize the strengths that a community has.

The idea of Asset Based Community Development surrounds six categories that every community possesses:
1)The gifts, talents, skills, and passions of individuals within that community; 2) The associations in which individuals participate in with no expectation of compensation; 3) The institutions individuals associate with as paid professionals; 4) The physical assets; 5) The economic resources; and 6) The community stories.

They describe three steps for harnessing these assets: 1) Find them (They offer ‘asset mapping’ as a way to do this); 2) Connect them; 3) Harness them to a hopeful vision of the future.

Researched and produced by: UMN Center for Intergrative Leadership, Spring 2012.
See following link to view all eleven community organizing models: http://www.incommons.org/node/6591

View Details
Syndicate content

Ways to Participate

Community Activity

Anonymous
Yesterday Anonymous commented on Can Electric Cars Save Minnesota's Air Quality?. -
Stephanie Curtis
3 weeks ago Stephanie Curtis updated their profile.
Lindsay Walz
3 weeks ago Lindsay Walz updated their profile.